A few mornings ago, Muttboy and I were walking on one of our usual paths through the big park. The trail followed a serpentine route around a few trees that had blown down in a freak thunderstorm and tornado that ripped through here a little over a year ago. Suddenly Muttboy perked up and started sprinting purposefully in a large arc around the blowdown. He clearly was not chasing a squirrel, I could tell, because his attitude, facial expressions, and speed are very different with that target. It wasn’t a deer he was after, either, because he is rarely interested in them unless they stand perfectly still until we get close; then he barks and lunges at them as if to tell them that they are prey and he is a hunter, so they’d better start flashing those silly white tails and take off. This chase was different: more intense and focused.
I saw him veer off and start to run back across the trail and toward the small hill in the distance. At the same moment, I saw a small animal running worriedly through the dead branches and start down the trail right where I was standing. It saw me and immediately turned off the trail and into the underbrush. I looked carefully at the little critter and was awestruck. It was a smallish coyote pup, about two and a half to three months old (coyotes whelp in April). I looked back to Muttboy, who was streaking away at the side of a furry blur in the distance. I called him and he immediately returned. When he got back to me, he sniffed eagerly at the path the other pup had taken. He looked expectantly up at me, but I knew it was best for us not to harass the little pup any more than we already had, so we walked on, Muttboy panting excitedly and glancing up at me with his eyes glowing.
The thing about this incident that keeps coming back to me is that moment when Muttboy began his chase and I knew instantly that he was after something more interesting and exciting than we usually encounter on the trail, and I was not all that surprised to see the little coyote pup running past me. Muttboy’s body language–everything about his posture, gait, expression, and pace told me as clearly as words could what he was after. When he returned, we communicated with no words, but we seemed to understand each other perfectly: he wanted to keep chasing, but he knew I didn’t want him to do that. It reminded me just how close the bond between humans and dogs can be that we can understand each other without speaking. I almost said “that we can understand each other without sharing a language,” but that is not quite right: we do share some sort of language.
Which brings me, in a rather circumlocutory manner, back to David Wroblewski’s The Story of Edgar Sawtelle. Edgar’s family raises dogs, and they breed the dogs based on his grandfather’s partly scientific and partly Romantic notion of what dogs could and should be. Instead of breeding for AKC standards of appearance, the Sawtelles breed for less tangible personality and behavioral characteristics. The dogs in the novel are eerily in tune with their humans, and one dog in particular, Almondine, is a touching model of the intimacy of that bond.
Edgar, who is around 14 during the main action of the story, was born without the ability to speak. He can hear, think, nad communicate perfectly well, but he can make no sounds. Language, then, becomes an adventure that for him is markedly different from the adventure that most of us experience when we begin to shape language for ourselves. Perhaps because language for him is something that separates him from others in some ways, Edgar is fascinated by words. In one early passage in the novel, he goes to the small metal box where the family stores all of the important papers, including an old Western Union telegram from their farm’s original owner, agreeing to sell the farm to Edgar’s grandfather.
But the telegram was what interested him most–a thick, yellowing sheet of paper with a Wester Union legend across the top, its message consisting of just six words, glued to the backing in strips: OFFER ACCEPTED SEE ADAMSKI RE PAPERS. Adamski was Mr. Schultz’s lawyer; his signature appeared on several documents in the box. The glue holding those words to the telegram had dried over the years, and each time Edgar snuck it out, another word dropped off. The first to go was PAPERS, then RE, then SEE. Eventually Edgar stopped taking the telegram out at all, fearing that when ACCEPTED fluttered into his lap, his family’s claim to the land would be reversed.
For Edgar, language is something powerfully talismanic. The metal box in which the papers are stored is an old ammunition box, and the two sides of language become evident here. Words can be the seeds that grow into the Sawtelle’s dog breeding venture, of they may be the ammunition that destroys lives. Either way, they are too powerful to be tossed around carelessly. Edgar, since he does not speak, conserves his words and deploys them, for the most part, very carefully.
There are other words lurking in strange places. When Edgar and his father take out a wall to replace a rotted-out window, they find things the old farmer Schultz had written on the beams: an apparently meaningless sum, a list of things to buy from the store. Yet, despite the language that is literally written upon the structure of their lives, the most dramatic scene in the novel is a bit of dumbshow, where Edgar has used his uncanny ability to communicate with his dogs to teach them to catch the conscience of a king.
Ah, Hamlet. The novel is quite clearly and unapologetically a retelling of Shakespeare’s play, but it manages to transform the material as smoothly and dramatically as Jane Smiley did with her transcendently beautiful reimagining of King Lear in A Thousand Acres. Like Hamlet, who strives to see through the hypocrisy and cant of mere “words, words, words,” Edgar tries to read a world he does not completely understand and act in a situation where no action is effective.
Hamlet finds himself cut off from all of the other characters; he becomes opaque to all of his friends, including Horatio. Edgar’s closest bond is with the dog Almondine, who realizes when Edgar first comes home from the hospital that her job, her sacred calling, is to be Edgar’s voice, and more than that, his soul. Here is Almondine reacting to the new baby and his lack of voice:
While Almondine pondered this, a sound reached her ears–a whispery rasp, barely audible, even to her. At first she couldn’t make sense of it. The moment she’d walked into the room she’d heard the breaths coming from the blanket, the ones that nearly matched his mother’s breathing, and so it took her a moment to understand that in this new sound, she was hearing distress–to realize that this near-silence was the sound of him wailing. She waited for the sound to stop, but it went on and on, as quiet as the rustle of the new leaves on the apple trees.
That was what the concern had been about, she realized.
The baby had no voice. It couldn’t make a sound.
Almondine knows at that moment that she is to be Edgar’s voice. She wakes Trudy to alert her to Edgar’s infant distress, and from then on the dog and the boy are intertwined. For me, the most heart-wrenching moment in the novel, the moment I had to stop and put the book aside, afraid I could not finish, was when Edgar, in his grief and anger over his father’s death, rejects Almondine, and the dog, unsure of why her soul has pushed her away, begins to pine. Only later does Edgar realize just what he has done in rejecting the dog. He has torn out his soul, and he has torn out his ability to speak. From this moment on, his failures to communicate build to the tragedy.
I will take a chance now. If this novel does not at least make the Pulitzer short list, there is something dreadfully wrong with the prize. That is all. Go read it–don’t wait for the paperback.
For an interview with Wroblewski, check out this article in today’s Times. And here is the book’s website, with convenient links to several online booksellers.
Read Full Post »